Are empire beside dark skin, who suntan instead of burn, smaller number at risk for skin cancer?

Are people next to darker skin, who suntan instead of burn, less at risk for skin cancer, as compared to relatives who are pale and burn a bit than tan?Are empire beside dark skin, who suntan instead of burn, smaller number at risk for skin cancer?
I'm no expert, but I'd read out YES and NO. People with dark complexions tend to produce more melanin which protects their skin from harmful rays (to a degree)! Individuals beside darker skin are still susceptible to mixed forms of skin cancer. If you're of African, Latin American, and/or South Asian descent, you should employ sunscreen on a day by day basis (not merely to protect your skin from the sun, but to moisturize).
yes
known certainty that people beside more melanin in their skin enjoy less risk of SKIN cancer, but not other types!
I mull over it is quite the different. People with overcast pigments are more likely yo stay contained by the sun increasing their chances of skin cancer.
Yes, I judge this is true.
Ive read this before.
sun is flawless for you cancer is genetic, look at all the associates who live in the jungle and desert, they have tans adjectives the time.
Stay out of the sun. It can be incurable. There have be many cases of skin cancer within young population. The damage the sun does is cummulative. I own read that one or two severe sun burns can cause cancer subsequently in go. All people regardless of their skin tone, burn first previously tanning. Please, stay out of the sun, or use sunscreen. A tanning bed is not better.
according to my nursing book you are right.and prolonged exposure to the sun DOES effect skin cancer.a lot of farmers and inhabitants who work outside develep skin cancer on their face
Yes, but that doesn't scrounging they can stay out in the sun adjectives of the time. They should be a little distrustful.
yes they are